A rumor circulating online claimed that Iranian officials had canceled the initial round of talks with the United States. The alleged reason for the cancellation was a breach of the agreement’s terms due to Israeli strikes in Lebanon.
These claims emerged days after Iran indicated its willingness to engage in a 60-day negotiation process with the U.S., provided certain conditions were met by Washington. These conditions reportedly included the release of frozen Iranian assets, the removal of restrictions on maritime activities, and the cessation of military operations before formal discussions could commence.
The rumor, attributed to an X user named Brian Allen, stated that Iran had suspended its entire 60-day negotiation framework. Allen’s post, presented as breaking news, alleged that Iran accused the U.S. of violating the first clause of a recently signed memorandum of understanding. According to Allen, citing Fars and Al-Mayadeen, Iranian officials considered Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon, occurring shortly after the agreement’s electronic signing, as a direct violation of U.S. obligations. The report further suggested that Iran’s delegation, which had been preparing to travel to Switzerland for the first round of talks, abruptly canceled their trip. Allen’s post concluded that the initial U.S.-Iran talks were effectively off the table.
However, this claim is not accurate. Iran has not suspended the entire 60-day negotiation process. Instead, Iranian negotiators have postponed their planned trip to Switzerland for the first round of talks. This postponement is a result of seeking assurances that commitments related to the conflict in Lebanon will be upheld.
According to an informed source cited by Hezbollah-affiliated Al Mayadeen, the Iranian negotiating team suspended its travel plans due to the continuation of Israeli attacks in southern Lebanon. The source indicated that the delegation had been preparing for the initial round of talks within the proposed 60-day framework before deciding to delay their journey.
The source also revealed that Iran had communicated to U.S. officials and mediators that developments in Lebanon were a significant factor in the progression of the negotiations. Iranian officials reportedly argued that ongoing Israeli military operations within Lebanese territory constituted a violation of the first clause of the memorandum of understanding and framework agreement.
In contrast, Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, expressed confidence in the negotiation process and in President Donald Trump’s role. Speaking to CNN, Danon characterized the memorandum of understanding as merely the starting point for negotiations and stated that Israel trusted Trump to secure a favorable outcome. He emphasized the strong relationship between the U.S. and Israel, highlighting their shared history of combating Tehran and expressed gratitude for President Trump’s leadership. Danon affirmed that Israel would evaluate the final results of the negotiations and trusted President Trump’s negotiating abilities and his commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear capabilities.
Reference